FirstCiv
FC–DOC–02Last reviewed 21 September 2026
Governance

Who decides what, and how that stays accountable

A project that asks communities for trust has to show its decision rules in public. These are ours, each marked with whether it is already in force.

LiveIn progressPlannedEvery commitment on these pages carries its real status.
§ 01Decision rights

Communities decide about their own heritage

  • A community objection is decisive

    Live

    The operator never overrules a community about its own cultural material. If a community asks us to correct, restrict or remove something about its culture, we do — including openly-licensed material.

  • The operator runs the platform

    Live

    Technical and operational decisions — hosting, security, code — sit with the founder.

  • Claiming a page

    Live

    Communities can ask to take over their culture's page, correct it, or retire it through For communities.

§ 02Review

People review; software assists

  • Human review before publication

    Live

    Every contribution is reviewed by a person before it is published. Nothing is published automatically.

  • AI only with separate consent

    Live

    An optional drafting assistant can suggest a transcription for a reviewer, and only when the contributor has granted the separate AI-processing consent. Its raw drafts are never shown publicly; only human-edited text can be published.

§ 03Accountability

A record anyone can check

Each moderation decision — review, publication, consent withdrawal — is appended to a hash-chained ledger. Every entry carries the fingerprint of the one before it, so a silent edit to the history breaks the chain. The ledger records decisions and holds no cultural material. Anyone can read it at /api/ledger.

§ 04Advisors

Indigenous advice before scale

  • A compensated advisory circle

    Planned

    Before the contribution pipeline is scaled, or FirstCiv joins any partner-led funding application, we will engage Indigenous advisors and pay for their time. FNIGC's OCAP® training is our first port of call for First Nations data governance.

  • Partner-led applications stay partner-led

    Live

    Where a fund prioritises or requires Indigenous leadership, FirstCiv takes part only as a technical partner, with the lead applicant holding the grant, the authority and the data.

§ 05Value

Benefit-sharing, on record before any money exists

FirstCiv has no revenue today. If it ever earns any, we commit to a 70 / 20 / 10 split: 70% to the communities whose material generated it, 20% to running the platform, 10% to a reserve. This will be written into every partnership agreement.

No NFTs, no tokens, no sale of cultural data — under any future model. A Heritage Tablet is a provenance record for an item in the archive; it cannot be bought or sold.

§ 06Legal status

Where the project stands

INNOVA CONSULT LTD. — federal corporation number (CBCA)
1522612-1
Grants or investment received
0
Community partnerships in place
0
Founder's base, Canada
Ottawa

FirstCiv is operated by INNOVA CONSULT LTD., a federal Canadian corporation based in Ottawa. Where a fund requires a non-profit or Indigenous-led applicant, FirstCiv takes part as a partner and the lead organisation holds the grant. Questions about this are welcome through the contact page.

Read the data sovereignty policy

How our practice maps to CARE and OCAP®, including what we cannot deliver yet.

Data sovereignty policy